Event Details

Title:Erroneous airspeed indications/stickshaker, Boeing 717-200, VH-NHX, February 28, 2006
Micro summary:This Boeing 717-200 experienced erroneous airspeed indications and stickshaker activation in cruise.
Event Time:2006-02-28 at 0855 YST
File Name:2006-02-28-US.pdf
Publishing Agency:National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
Publishing Country:USA
Report number:DCA06WA028
Site of event:Cruise, 122 mi south of Paraburdoo, Western Australia.
Departure:Paraburdoo Airport, Paraburdoo, Western Australia, Australia
Airplane Type(s):Boeing 717-200
Flight Phase:Cruise
Operator(s):National Jet
Type of flight:Revenue
Serious Injuries:0
Other Injuries:0
Executive Summary:On February 28, 2006, about 0855 western standard coordinated time, a Boeing 717-200, Australian registration VH-NXH, operated by National Jet, experienced erroneous airspeed indications and stick shaker activation while in cruise flight about 122 miles south of Paraburdoo, Western Australia. There were no injuries to 2 certificated pilots, 4 flight attendants, and 66 passengers. Night instrument meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight that departed from Paraburdoo, about 0000, destined for Perth. An instrument flight rules flight plan was filed for the scheduled domestic flight.

According to an interim factual report issued by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau, the weather conditions for the flight were under the influence of a decaying tropical cyclone that had crossed the northwest coast of Western Australia earlier that day. Rain and heavy cloud conditions persisted through most of the region. The meteorological forecast indicated a temperature of -39 degrees Celsius at the airplane's planned cruise altitude. The flight crew had selected the engines anti-ice system "ON" during the climb. The autopilot was engaged and had captured the planned cruise altitude of FL340. The airspeed, body angle, and engine power settings were normal for that stage of flight and the airplane was accelerating normally to cruise speed. During that period, the flight crew detected that, over several seconds, the speed displayed on the primary flight display (PFD) for stick shaker activation (Vss) began converging towards the current indicated airspeed. The speed indicated for Vss appeared to overtake the amber caution foot associated with the flight management computer (FMC) calculated minimum operating speed (Vmin), which appeared to be remaining stationary, rather than moving in conjunction with the Vss indication.

The stick shaker warning activated as Vss merged with the current airspeed and then continued to increase and merge with the maximum operating speed (Vmo/Mmo). The right edge of the airspeed tapegave the appearance of one continuous red chevron "zipper." Similar indications were observed on both pilots' PFDs. The flight crew reported that they did not receive any other cautions, alerts, or warnings on the airplane's engine and alert display. The flight crew recalled that, although the pitch limit indicator had turned red, indicating that the airplane was at or near a stalled condition, there was no "STALL" annunciation on the PFD, nor any aural "STALL STALL" warning or klaxon alert. The flight crew initiated an immediate on-track descent and advised air traffic services (ATS) of their requirement to change altitude. The stick pusher stall recovery system did not activate and the flight crew did not identify any secondary indications of an impeding stall, such as aerodynamic buffet or an abnormally high pitch attitude. Although the flight crew did not detect any evidence of airframe ice on the windscreen or windscreen wiper posts, they selected the airframe anti-ice "ON." They did not otherwise change the configuration of the airplane. The stick shaker continued to operate as the airplane was descending approximately 2,000 feet per minute. The flight crew recalled that the speed indicated on the PFD for Vss returned to normal as the airplane descended through FL290 and that the stick shaker warning ceased at that time. The flight crew leveled the airplane at FL280 with all of the airplane's controls and system indications "normal." Once the in-flight weather conditions improved, the airplane was returned to FL300, and the flight landed at Perth without further incident.

The operator's maintenance engineers performed a built-in test equipment check following the airplane's arrival in Perth. The check confirmed that no faults had been recorded during the occurrence flight and the airplane was released for service. Subsequent flights were completed without incident.

The airplane's flight data recorder (FDR) and the electronic recording media for the quick access recorder (QAR) were removed for analysis. Data was also recovered from the non-volatile memory of the airplane's flight control computers (FCC). The FDR data indicated that the output from each of the airplane's angle of attack (AoA) sensors became static (continuously indicating about 4 degrees AoA) passing FL287 on climb, at a total indicated air temperature (TAT) of -4 degrees Celsius. The stick shaker activated approximately 80 seconds after the airplane had reached FL340, as it was accelerating through a computed airspeed of 258 knots and at a TAT of -10 degrees Celsius. About 14 seconds later the recorded data indicated the commencement of a descent from FL340. The stick shaker indication continued for another 2 minutes 23 seconds, ceasing as the airplane passed FL288, at a computed airspeed of 308 knots and a TAT of approximately +7 degrees Celsius. Associated with the cessation of the stick shaker warning were the AoA sensors returning to normal operation. The QAR media was found to contain no recorded data. Examination of that file indicated that the recording media was incorrectly formatted for use in the QAR. The manufacturer of the airplane's FCC analyzed the contents of each computer's non-volatile memory. That analysis revealed no fault history data for the day of the incident.

On March 3, 2006, an entry was made in the airplane's maintenance log, reporting the intermittent operation of the air data heat switch annunciator after the system was selected "OFF" following landing. An indicating globe was replaced and the switch tested serviceable before the airplane was returned to service.

The airplane's AoA sensors and air data heat switch were subsequently removed from the airplane and dispatched for examination by the component manufacturers under the direct supervision of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

The incident is under the jurisdiction of, and is being investigated by, the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Further information can be obtained from:

Australian Transport Safety Bureau
15 Mort Street, Braddon ACT 2612, Australia
P.O. Box 967, Civic Square ACT 2608, Australia

Phone +61 2 6230 4408
Fax +61 2 6274 6434
Web site www.atsb.gov.au
Learning Keywords:Operations - Icing
Systems - Flight Instruments
Systems - Pitot/Static System
Systems - Wing or Engine Anti-ice
Close match:Stall on takeoff, Birgenair, Boeing 757, TC-GEN
Loss of airspeed displays, Serious incident, 05.04.1998, near Frankfurt/Main Airport, to an Airbus A320-200
Incorrect airspeed indications, UPS 747-200 at Dublin Airport, May 12, 2000
In-flight loss of both engines, McDonnell Douglas MD-82, June 4, 2002
Runway Overrun Following Rejected Takeoff, Continental Airlines Flight 795, McDonnell Douglas MD-82, N18835, Laguardia Airport, Flushing, New York, March 2, 1994
Stall on takeoff, Air Florida, Inc., Boeing 737-222, N62AF, Collision With 14th Street Bridge, Near Washington National Airport, Washington, D.C., January 13, 1982
In-flight upset, Northwest Airlines, Inc., Boeing 727-251, N274US, Near Thiells, New York, December 1, 1974
Stall in climb, Boeing 757-200, TF-FII, October 20, 2002


Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
 All referenced trademarks are the property of their respective owners.