Event Details


Title:Loss of tail empennage on landing, McDonnell-Douglas Corporation, DC-9-80; N980DC, Edwards Air Force Base, California, May 2, 1980
Micro summary:This McDonnell-Douglas DC-9-80 experienced a loss of its tail empennage in this landing during the test-flight program.
Event Time:1980-05-02 at 0634 PDT
File Name:1980-05-02-US.pdf
Publishing Agency:National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
Publishing Country:USA
Report number:NTSB-AAR-82-2
Pages:25
Site of event:Edwards AFB runway 22
Departure:Edwards Air Force Base, California, USA
Destination:Edwards Air Force Base, California, USA
Airplane Type(s):McDonnell Douglas DC-9-80 (MD-80)
Flight Phase:Landing
Registration(s):N980DC
Operator(s):McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Type of flight:Certification Test Flight
Occupants:7
Fatalities:0
Serious Injuries:1
Minor/Non-Injured:6
Other Injuries:0
Executive Summary:About 0634 P.d.t, May 2, 1980, a McDonnell-Douglas, Inc., DC-9-80, N980DC, crashed while trying to land on runway 22 at Edwards Air Force Base, California.

The aircraft was on a certification test flight to determine the horizontal distance required to land and bring the aircraft to a full stop as required by 14 CFR 25.125 when the accident occurred.

The aircraft touched down about 2,298 feet beyond the runway threshold. The descent rate at touchdown exceeded the aircraft's structural limitations; the empennage separated from the aircraft and fell to the runway. The aircraft came to rest about 5,634 feet beyond the landing threshold of runway 22 and was damaged substantially. Seven crewmembers were on board; one crewmember, a flight test engineer, broke his left ankle when the aircraft touched down.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the pilot's failure to stabilize the approach as prescribed by the manufacturer's flight test procedures. Contributing to the cause of the accident was the lack of a requirement in the flight test procedures for other flight crewmembers to monitor and call out the critical flight parameters. Also contributing to this accident were the flight test procedures prescribed by the manufacturer for demonstrating the aircraft's landing performance which involved vertical descent rates approaching the design load limits of the aircraft.
Learning Keywords:Operations - Hard Landing
Consequence - Damage - Airframe or fuselage
Close match:Botched landing, Accident to Boeing 757-200 G-BYAG at Girona Airport on 14 September 1999
Hard landing, Report on the accident to Boeing MD11 B-150 at Hong Kong International Airport on 22 August 1999
Hard Landing, Royal Jordanian Airlines Airbus A310-300 (JY-AGK) at Shannon Airport, Ireland, December 17, 1999
Tailstrike on landing, Airbus A321-231, G-MIDA, 14 August 1998
Hard landing, BAe 146-200, G-JEAJ
Hard Landing, Gear Collapse, Federal Express Flight 647, Boeing MD-10-10F, N364FE, Memphis, Tennessee, December 18, 2003
Hard landing, Eastern Air Lines, Inc., DC-9-31, N8961E, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, May 18, 1972
Hard landing, Alitalia Airlines, McDonnell-Douglas DC-8-62, I-DIWZ (Italian Registry), John F. Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica, New York, September 15, 1970
Landed short, Loftleidir Icelandic Airlines, Inc., Douglas DC-8-61, John F. Kennedy International Airport, Jamaica, New York, June 23, 1973
Bounce and Hard landing, Boeing 757-232, June 2, 1999
Hard landing and tail strike, McDonnell Douglas DC-9-51, June 14, 2000
Hard landing, Boeing 737-4Y0, April 13, 1995
Hard landing, McDonnell Douglas MD-88, February 4, 1996
Hard landing, McDonnell Douglas MD-88, July 27, 1993
Hard landing, Boeing 757-232, February 12, 2000

 




Accident Reports on DVD, Copyright © 2006 by Flight Simulation Systems, LLC.  All Rights Reserved.
 All referenced trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
www.fss.aero